4.3.2Operating Segments and Directional Reporting

Operating segments

The Company’s reportable operating segments as defined by IFRS 8 ‘Operating segments’ are:

• Lease and Operate;
• Turnkey
• Other.

Directional reporting

Strictly for the purposes of this note, the operating segments are measured under Directional reporting, which in essence follows IFRS, but deviates on two main points:

• All lease contracts are classified and accounted for as if they were operating lease contracts under IFRS 16. Some lease and operate contracts may provide for defined invoicing (‘upfront payments’) to the client occurring during the construction phase or at first-oil (beginning of the lease phase), to cover specific construction work and/or services performed during the construction phase. These ’upfront payments’ are recognized as revenues and the costs associated with the construction work and/or services are recognized as ’Cost of sales’ with no margin during the construction. As a consequence, these costs are not capitalized in the gross value of the assets under construction. 
• All investees related to Lease and Operate contracts are accounted for at the Company’s share as if they were classified as joint operations under IFRS 11, whereby all lines of the income statement, statement of financial position and cash flow statement are consolidated based on Company’s percentage of ownership (hereafter referred to as ’percentage of ownership consolidation’). Yards and installation vessel related joint ventures remain equity accounted.

In 2021, all other accounting principles remain unchanged compared with applicable IFRS standards.

The above differences to the consolidated financial statements between Directional reporting and IFRS are highlighted in the reconciliations provided in this note on revenue, gross margin, EBIT and EBITDA as required by IFRS 8 ’Operating segments’. The Company also provides the reconciliation of the statement of financial position and cash flow statement under IFRS and Directional reporting. The statement of financial position and the cash flow statement under Directional reporting are evaluated regularly by the Management Board in assessing the financial position and cash generation of the Company. The Company believes that these disclosures should enable users of its financial statements to better evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business activities in which it engages, while facilitating the understanding of the Directional reporting by providing a straightforward reconciliation with IFRS for all key financial metrics.

Segment highlights

The Lease and Operate Directional Revenue and EBITDA decreased versus the year ago period mainly driven by the Deep Panuke MOPU early redelivery in July 2020. That unit has fully contributed to positive results of the Lease and Operate during the year 2020, including (i) accelerated Revenue and EBITDA recognized for US$77 million following the final settlement signed with the client and (ii) additional one-off contributions from the demobilization activities, while not contributing to the results in 2021.

The Turnkey Directional Revenue and EBITDA increased versus the year ago period, reflecting the general ramp-up of Turnkey activities with (i) five FPSO’s under construction, (ii) the awarded limited scope for the FPSO for the Yellowtail development project and (iii) the increase in Offshore services business in 2021. The 2020 Turnkey EBTIDA was also impacted by US$40 million of restructuring costs following the company decision to reorganize the allocation of activities between centers to become more efficient.

2021 operating segments (Directional)

Reconciliation of 2021 operating segments (Directional to IFRS)

The reconciliation from Directional reporting to IFRS comprises two main steps:

• In the first step, those lease contracts that are classified and accounted for as finance lease contracts under IFRS are restated from an operating lease accounting treatment to a finance lease accounting treatment.
• In the second step, the consolidation method is changed i) from percentage of ownership consolidation to full consolidation for those Lease and Operate related subsidiaries over which the Company has control and ii) from percentage of ownership consolidation to the equity method for those Lease and Operate related investees that are classified as joint ventures in accordance with IFRS 11.

Impact of lease accounting treatment

For the Lease and Operate segment, the restatement from an operating to a finance lease accounting treatment has the main following impacts for the 2021 period:

• Revenue reduced by US$(327) million. This primarily resulted from the two following opposite effects:
  • During the lease period, under IFRS, the revenue from finance leases is limited to that portion of charter rates that is recognized as interest using the interest effective method. Under Directional reporting, in accordance with the operating lease treatment, the full charter rate is recognized as revenue, on a straight-line basis. This resulted in a difference of US$(406) million in 2021.
  • A revenue of US$155 million (at 100%) was accounted under IFRS following the signature of an agreement for a six years extension for the lease and operate contracts of the FPSO Kikeh located in Malaysia. This additional revenue resulted from the qualification of the lease as a finance lease under IFRS and is reported as US$76 million (the Company's ownership share) within the 'Impact of Lease accounting treatment' and entirely reclassified to the line item 'Share of profit/(loss) of equity-accounted investees’ within the 'Impact of the consolidation method' (the FPSO Kikeh being accounted as per equity method under IFRS). The one-shot impact related to the extension is thus recognized at the Company's ownership share through 'Share of profit/(loss) of equity-accounted investees' under IFRS only.
• Gross margin increased by US$48 million and EBIT increased by US$55 million. This again resulted mainly from two opposite effects:
  • Under IFRS, gross margin and EBIT from finance leases equal to the recognized revenue, following the declining profile of the interest recognized using the interest effective method. On the other side, under the operating lease treatment applied under Directional, the gross margin and the EBIT correspond to the revenue and depreciation of the recognized PP&E, both accounted for on a straight-line basis over the lease period. This resulted in a difference of US$(28) million in 2021.
  • As mentioned above, FPSO Kikeh had a positive impact on the IFRS Gross Margin following the extension of the lease and operate contracts, to the same extent as for revenue. This additional Gross margin amounting US$76 million, recognized only under IFRS, is reported within the 'Impact of lease accounting treatment' and entirely reclassified to the line item 'Share of profit/(loss) of equity-accounted investees’ within the 'Impact of the consolidation method'.

For the Turnkey segment, the restatement from operating to finance lease accounting treatment had the following impacts over the 2021 period:

• Revenue and gross margin increased by US$1,786 million and US$289 million respectively, mainly due to the accounting treatment of Liza Unity (FPSO), Prosperity (FPSO), FPSO Sepetiba, FPSO Almirante Tamandaré, FPSO Alexandre de Gusmão and the initial limited scope for the FPSO for the Yellowtail development project as finance leases under IFRS. Under IFRS, a finance lease is considered as if it was a sale of the asset leading to recognition of revenue during the construction of the asset corresponding to the present value of the future lease payments. This (mostly non-cash) revenue is recognized within the Turnkey segment.
• The basic impact on Turnkey EBIT is largely in line with the impact on gross margin. EBITDA impact is lower than for EBIT and gross margin due to the exclusion from EBITDA of the impact of the reassessment of residual value of finance lease receivable leading to a reversal of impairment in 2021.

As a result, the restatement from operating to finance lease accounting treatment results in an increase of net profit of US$268 million under IFRS when compared with Directional reporting.

Impact of consolidation methods

The impact of consolidation methods in the above table describes the net impact from:

• Percentage of ownership consolidation to full consolidation for those Lease and Operate related subsidiaries over which the Company has control, resulting in an increase of revenue, gross margin, EBIT and EBITDA;
• Percentage of ownership consolidation to the equity accounting method for those Lease and Operate related investees that are classified as joint ventures in accordance with IFRS 11, resulting in a decrease of revenue, gross margin, EBIT and EBITDA.

For the Lease and Operate segment, the impact of the changes in consolidation methods results in a net increase of revenue, gross margin, EBIT, EBITDA and net profit under IFRS when compared with Directional reporting. This reflects the fact that the majority of the Company’s FPSOs, that are leased under finance lease contracts, are owned by subsidiaries over which the Company has control and which are consolidated using the full consolidation method under IFRS.

For the Turnkey segment, the impact of the changes in consolidation methods is limited, reflecting the fact that most of the turnkey activities are performed by subsidiaries fully owned by the Company.

2020 operating segments (Directional)

• ¹ Includes net impairment losses on financial and contract assets.

Reconciliation of 2020 operating segments (Directional to IFRS)

Reconciliation of 2021 statement of financial position (Directional to IFRS)

• ¹ Under Directional, the cost related to the Brazilian local content penalty is capitalized in line with construction progress of related assets and presented in the Directional statement of financial position under 'Property, plant and equipment and Intangible assets'. Under IFRS the same cost is directly recognized as cost of sales in the IFRS consolidated income statement
• ² Includes US$3,310 million related to units under construction.
• ³ Includes US$246 million related to demobilization receivable.
• ⁴ Includes US$2,928 million non-recourse debt and US$57 million lease liability.

Consistent with the reconciliation of the key income statement line items, the above table details:

• The restatement from the operating lease accounting treatment to the finance lease accounting treatment for those lease contracts that are classified and accounted for as finance lease contracts under IFRS; and
• The change from percentage of ownership consolidation to either full consolidation or equity accounting for investees related to Lease and Operate contracts.

Impact of lease accounting treatment

For the statement of financial position, the main adjustments from Directional reporting to IFRS as of December 31, 2021 are:

• For those lease contracts that are classified and accounted for as finance lease contracts under IFRS, de-recognition of property, plant and equipment recognized under Directional reporting (US$(6,750) million) and subsequent recognition of (i) finance lease receivables (US$4,706 million) and (ii) construction work-in-progress (US$3,532 million) for those assets still under construction.
• For operating lease contracts with non-linear bareboat day rates, a deferred income provision is recognized to show linear revenues under Directional reporting. The part of the balance (US$(308) million) is derecognized for the contracts that are classified and accounted for as finance lease contracts under IFRS.
• Restatement of the provisions for demobilization and associated non-current receivable assets, mainly impacting other financial assets (US$(209) million) and provisions (US$(213) million).

As a result, the restatement from operating to finance lease accounting treatment gives rise to an increase of equity of US$1,969 million under IFRS compared with Directional reporting. This primarily reflects the earlier margin recognition on finance lease contracts under IFRS compared to Directional reporting.

Impact of consolidation methods

The above table of statement of financial position also describes the net impact of moving from percentage of ownership consolidation to either full consolidation, for those lease related investees in which the Company has control, or equity accounting, for those investees that are classified as joint ventures under IFRS 11. The two main impacts are:

• Full consolidation of asset specific entities that mainly comprise finance lease receivables (representing the net present value of the future lease payments to be received) and non-recourse project debts.
• Derecognition of the individual line items from the statement of financial positions for those entities that are equity accounted under IFRS, rolling up in the line item ’Investment in associates and joint ventures’.

Reconciliation of 2021 cash flow statement (Directional to IFRS)

Impact of lease accounting treatment

At net cash level, the difference in lease accounting treatment is neutral. The impact of the different lease accounting treatment under Directional reporting versus IFRS is limited to reclassifications between cash flow activities.

A large part of the capital expenditures (US$1,422 million) are reclassified from investing activities under Directional, to net cash flows from operating activity under IFRS, where finance lease contracts are accounted for as construction contracts. Furthermore, the financing costs incurred during the construction of the FPSOs, which are capitalized under Directional as part of asset under construction (and therefore presented in investing activities) are reclassified to financing activities under IFRS.

The impact of the change of lease accounting treatment at EBITDA level is described in further detail in the earlier reconciliation of the Company’s income statement.

Impact of consolidation methods

The impact of the consolidation method on the cash flow statement is in line with the impact described for the statement of financial position. The full consolidation of asset specific entities, mainly comprising finance lease receivables and the related non-recourse project debts, results in increased additions and repayments of borrowings under IFRS versus Directional.

Reconciliation of 2020 statement of financial position (Directional to IFRS)

• ¹ Under Directional, the cost related to the Brazilian local content penalty is capitalized in line with construction progress of related assets and presented in the Directional statement of financial position under 'Property, plant and equipment and Intangible assets'. Under IFRS the same cost is directly recognized as cost of sales in the IFRS consolidated income statement
• ² Includes US$1,759 million related to (i) units under construction (i.e. FPSOs Liza Unity, Prosperity and Sepetiba) and (ii) Gene tanker.
• ³ Includes US$273 million related to demobilization receivable.
• ⁴ Includes US$3,150 million non-recourse debt and US$71 million lease liability.

Reconciliation of 2020 cash flow statement (Directional to IFRS)

Deferred income (Directional)

The Directional deferred income is mainly related to the revenue of those lease contracts, which include a decreasing day-rate schedule. As revenue is recognized in the income statement on a straight-line basis with reference to IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, the difference between the yearly straight-line revenue and the contractual day rates is included as deferred income. The deferral will be released through the income statement over the remaining duration of the relevant lease contracts.